Courageous Conservatives PAC Fights Back Against SLAPP Lawsuit, Defending Free Speech in Texas
TL;DR
The Courageous Conservatives PAC's legal battle against Rep. Pat Curry's lawsuit showcases a strategic defense of free speech, offering a blueprint for resisting political intimidation.
Courageous Conservatives PAC utilizes the Texas Citizens Participation Act to challenge a lawsuit, detailing how legal protections for free speech and association apply to their case.
This case underscores the importance of protecting free speech and civic engagement, ensuring a future where public accountability and democratic values prevail.
A political showdown in Texas highlights the clash between free speech and political retribution, with Courageous Conservatives PAC standing firm against silencing tactics.
Found this article helpful?
Share it with your network and spread the knowledge!

The Courageous Conservatives Political Action Committee (PAC) is currently embroiled in a legal battle that underscores the delicate balance between free speech and political accountability in Texas. At the heart of the dispute is a lawsuit filed by Rep. Pat Curry, which the PAC alleges is a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP), designed to intimidate and silence its critics. The PAC, a staunch advocate for conservative values, is leveraging the Texas Citizens Participation Act to seek dismissal of the lawsuit, arguing that the communications in question—texts and Facebook posts—were lawful efforts to foster civic engagement.
Chris Ekstrom, Chairman of the Courageous Conservatives PAC, has been vocal in his criticism of the lawsuit, framing it as a politically motivated attack on the fundamental rights of free speech and petition. The PAC's legal team, led by Jerad Najvar, contends that Rep. Curry's lawsuit fails to address the legal merits of the case, particularly the protections afforded to political speech under the TCPA. The PAC's stance is not merely defensive; it is also seeking attorney’s fees and sanctions against what it views as a frivolous and retaliatory legal action.
The implications of this legal confrontation extend far beyond the immediate parties involved. A hearing scheduled for June 6, 2025, in Waco, TX, could set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future, potentially influencing the landscape of political discourse and accountability in Texas. The outcome may also serve as a litmus test for the robustness of First Amendment protections in the face of legal challenges from public officials. For businesses and organizations operating in Texas, the case highlights the importance of understanding the legal protections available for political speech and the potential risks of engaging in public debate.
This case is a reminder of the critical role that free speech plays in a functioning democracy, especially in the context of political engagement and accountability. The Courageous Conservatives PAC's fight against what it perceives as an attempt to stifle dissent is not just about the specifics of this lawsuit; it's about defending the principles that underpin the American Republic. As the legal proceedings unfold, the eyes of Texas—and indeed, the nation—will be watching closely to see how the courts navigate the complex interplay between law, politics, and free speech.
Curated from News Direct


